Legal Opinion
Newell v. Vervaeke
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1937No. 26243. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.
On and for some time prior to July 25, 1934, Gr. Vervaeke and his wife were the owners of a considerable tract of land in Stevens county, valuable principally for the mineral it contained, including lode mining claims known as Legal Tender, Deer Trail No. 2, Victor, Runyon, Hoodoo, Hoodoo Extension, and Idaho.
On the date mentioned, Mr. and Mrs. Vervaeke granted to E. O. Quackenbush an option to purchase a considerable portion of their holdings, including the mining claims above mentioned. By the terms of the option, the purchaser was to pay $5,000 on or before August 13, 1934; $1,500 on or…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stetson-Post Mill Co. v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Kremer v. WaltonWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Kremer v. WaltonWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Dahlman v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Baker v. SinclaireWashington Supreme Court · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hewson Construction, Inc. v. Reintree Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
- Nelson v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- W. T. Watts, Inc. v. SherrerWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Ketner Bros., Inc. v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1958