Legal Opinion

Finos v. Netherlands American Mortgage Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1928No. 20895. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Respondent brought this action, on his own behalf individually and as assignee of five other claimants, to recover amounts alleged to be due for labor upon a mining claim performed by respondent and his assignors, of which mining claim the defendants were alleged to be, respectively, owner, lessors and lessees. The complaint alleged that the Netherlands American Mortgage Bank, a corporation, owned the fee, and that defendants Cashman and wife were contract purchasers from the bank, and the other defendants named in the complaint, and their respective wives, were lessees of the mine. Upon the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Heal v. Evans Creek Coal & Coke Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. National Bank of Commerce v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  4. Griffiths v. Von HerbergWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. McQueen v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Randles v. Washington State Liquor Control BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State v. LawtonWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. C. S. Barlow & Sons v. H. & B. Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Hanover Res., LLC v. LML Props., LLCWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Newell v. VervaekeWashington Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API