Greenawalt v. Rogers
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. McNutt & Hannon, Will D. Gould, and James H. Blanchard, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
This is an action brought to obtain a decree canceling and setting aside a satisfaction of judgment claimed to have been entered in reliance upon fraudulent representations by the defendant. The trial court made a decree in favor of the plaintiffs, and the defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The complaint alleges that in June, 1890, one A. H. Judson recovered a judgment against the defendant, Ralph Rogers, for $1,793.95. In July, 1895, A. H. Judson transferred the judgment to the plaintiff Greenawalt for collection, under an agreement that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Colton v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Kelley v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Oppenheimer v. ClunieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Spinks v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Elliott v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. GreenbachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- In Re Cheryl E.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- McKeehan v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- County of Ventura Public Social Services Agency v. Edwin E.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.