Bland v. Southern Pacific R.R.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the defendant, in the Twentieth District Court, County of Santa Clara.' Belden, J.
1Opinion of the Court
McKinstry, J.;
The complaint alleges that while plaintiff was a passenger upon defendant’s cars, the defendant unlawfully, maliciously, and wantonly assaulted, beat, bruised, insulted, and maltreated plaintiff, and with force of arms ejected him from said cars. The answer is a denial, and, as a further defense, that after the train had started upon a regular trip to San Francisco, plaintiff informed the conductor in charge of the train that he intended to and would be transported from San José to San Francisco; that the conductor demanded of plaintiff that he exhibit a ticket, or pay the…
2Cited by12 opinions
- South Carolina Railroad v. NixSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
- Hall v. Memphis & Charleston R.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1882
- Braun v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Elliott v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Bland v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.