Legal Opinion

Bland v. Southern Pacific R.R.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 6,137PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the defendant, in the Twentieth District Court, County of Santa Clara.' Belden, J.

1Opinion of the Court

McKinstry, J.;

The complaint alleges that while plaintiff was a passenger upon defendant’s cars, the defendant unlawfully, maliciously, and wantonly assaulted, beat, bruised, insulted, and maltreated plaintiff, and with force of arms ejected him from said cars. The answer is a denial, and, as a further defense, that after the train had started upon a regular trip to San Francisco, plaintiff informed the conductor in charge of the train that he intended to and would be transported from San José to San Francisco; that the conductor demanded of plaintiff that he exhibit a ticket, or pay the…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. South Carolina Railroad v. NixSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  2. Hall v. Memphis & Charleston R.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1882
  3. Braun v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Elliott v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Bland v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API