Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Mason v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 28, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1ConcurrenceHoke, J.

J., and ALLEN, J., dissenting. Civil action to recover damages for an alleged unlawful ejection of plaintiff from passenger train of the defendant.

This issue was submitted to the jury:

Was the plaintiff a passenger on the defendant's train, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: No.

There was a judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff excepted and appealed. The question presented by this appeal and raised by the assignments of error is whether the plaintiff was a passenger upon the defendant's train and unlawfully ejected. It is admitted that he was ejected by the conductor under direct orders…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Mosher v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Boylan v. Hot Springs RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Boling v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  5. Harvey v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. Railroad Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API