Riverside County Sheriff's Department v. Stiglitz
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J
Here we hold that when hearing an administrative appeal from discipline imposed on a correctional officer, an arbitrator may rule upon a discovery motion for officer personnel records, commonly referred to as a Pitchess motion. (Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531 [113 Cal.Rptr. 897, 522 P.2d 305] (Pitchess); Evid. Code, §§ 1043, 1045.) Evidence Code section 1043 expressly provides that Pitchess motions may be filed with an appropriate “administrative body.” The language reflects a legislative intent that administrative hearing officers be allowed to rule on…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. MoocCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- In re RenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Santa Clarita Organization for Planning & the Environment v. Castaic Lake Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Santa Clarita Organization for Planning & the Environment v. AbercrombieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Espinoza, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.