Legal Opinion

Riverside County Sheriff's Department v. Stiglitz

California Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 2014No. S206350PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J

Here we hold that when hearing an administrative appeal from discipline imposed on a correctional officer, an arbitrator may rule upon a discovery motion for officer personnel records, commonly referred to as a Pitchess motion. (Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531 [113 Cal.Rptr. 897, 522 P.2d 305] (Pitchess); Evid. Code, §§ 1043, 1045.) Evidence Code section 1043 expressly provides that Pitchess motions may be filed with an appropriate “administrative body.” The language reflects a legislative intent that administrative hearing officers be allowed to rule on…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. MoocCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. In re RenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Santa Clarita Organization for Planning & the Environment v. Castaic Lake Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Santa Clarita Organization for Planning & the Environment v. AbercrombieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. People v. Espinoza, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API