Legal Opinion
Connor v. First Student, Inc.
California Supreme Court
Decided August 20, 2018No. S229428PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChin, J.
*828 *1030 We granted review to resolve a conflict in the Courts of Appeal over whether the Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act (ICRAA) ( Civ. Code, § 1786 et seq. ) 1 is unconstitutionally vague, in violation of due process, as applied to employer background checks because it overlaps, in part, with the Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act (CCRAA) (§ 1785.1 et seq.). We agree with the Court of Appeal that some overlap between the two statutes does not render ICRAA unconstitutionally vague when the statutes are otherwise unambiguous. We therefore affirm the Court of Appeal judgment.
FACTS…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Powell v. United States Cartridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- A. B. Small Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Gabriel Moran v. the Screening ProsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- People v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- San Diego Unified Sch. Dist. v. Yee, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Bernuy v. Bridge Property Management Co.California Court of Appeal · 2023
- Bradsbery v. Vicar OperatingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.