Legal Opinion

Babbitt v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 25, 1924No. Appeal, No. 149PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff sued to recover the price of a carload of chloride of lime sold and delivered, under a contract in writing which provided for a test.of 35-37% available chlorine, f. o. b. Echota or Niagara Falls, New York. The affidavit of defense does not deny liability for the amount of plaintiff’s claim but avers a set-off to an amount exactly equal to that sued for and is based on alleged breach of . warranty in a shipment of that material previously made and paid for by defendant. A verdict was rendered for the full amount of plaintiff’s claim. Subsequently a rule for a new trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Hess v. GusdorffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Sloan v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. March v. Philadelphia & West Chester Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Tate-Jones & Co. v. Union Electric Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Simmons-Boardman Publishing Co. v. American Boron Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Weiss v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Duaine v. Gulf Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API