Duaine v. Gulf Refining Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Plaintiff recovered a verdict for a substantial sum to compensate him for personal injuries due, as he alleges, to defendant’s negligence; the court below set aside the verdict on the ground of its excessiveness, and ordered a new trial; plaintiff appeals, contending that the order in question presents a plain abuse of discretion in that (1) the verdict was not in fact excessive, and (2), if it was, the correct remedy would have been for the court below to designate an amount it conceived to be proper and let plaintiff accept either such amount or a new trial.
The question of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Gail v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Hollinger v. York Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Rea v. Pittsburg & Connellsville RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Potts Et Ux. v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bailey v. C. Lewis Lavine, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Frank, Admr. v. BayukSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Feite v. GollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Williamson v. McCrackenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Walker v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959