Legal Opinion

Simmons-Boardman Publishing Co. v. American Boron Products Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 26, 1925No. Appeal, 121PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The court below granted a new trial; when entering the order here appealed from, it indicated the belief that the ends of justice required the rehearing of the case because of certain after-discovered evidence offered by defendant, against whom the verdict was found. Plaintiff has appealed and contends that the new evidence might have been discovered prior to the trial of the case had defendant been diligent, and hence there was an abuse of discretion in the order here complained of.

In Class & Nachod B. Co. v. Giacobello, 277 Pa. 530, 537-8, we said, inter alia: “Because the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Hunter v. BremerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Reist v. WoganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Babbitt v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Republic Mortgage Co. v. IrwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. March v. Philadelphia & West Chester Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Kingsdorf v. Frank Gamburg, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Commonwealth v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Com. v. Felder, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. Feite v. GollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API