Legal Opinion

Sloan v. Miller

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1923No. Appeals, Nos. 26 and 35PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

In this case plaintiff sued to recover commissions, alleged to be due him as agent for defendant in the sale of certain real estate; the jury rendered a verdict for the former; the latter moved for a new trial and for judgment n. o. v.; the court below granted the first motion and denied the second; both sides have appealed; plaintiff complains of the order entered, and defendant because of the refusal of his motion for judgment n. o. v.

The court below states, — in its opinion granting the new trial and refusing judgment n. o. v., — that, though the testimony given by plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hess v. GusdorffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Alianell v. SchreinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Ferry v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. DeWaele v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Bayard v. Pennsylvania Knitting Mills Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Babbitt v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Rittenhouse v. Exeter MacHine Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Smith v. City Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Blair County1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API