Legal Opinion

Weiss v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 1, 1924No. Appeal, 104PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial. Since the record does not demonstrate clear error of law or abuse of discretion on the part of the court below in making the order assigned as error, the assignment must be overruled: Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. Giacobello, 277 Pa. 530; Republic Mortgage Co. v. Irwin et al., 278 Pa. 124; Babbitt v. Jackson, 279 Pa. 480.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Babbitt v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Republic Mortgage Co. v. IrwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. March v. Philadelphia & West Chester Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Weiss v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Rittenhouse v. Exeter MacHine Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Harkai v. PisanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Dorris v. Bridgman & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API