Legal Opinion

Union Bank v. Gradsky

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 19, 1968No. Civ. 31681PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHufstedler, J.

Plaintiff, Union Bank (“Bank”), appeals from a judgment of dismissal, entered after the demurrer of defendant Max Gradsky (‘ ‘ Max ”) to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend. The trial court dismissed the action on the ground that section 580d of the Code of Civil Procedure shielded a guarantor of a note secured by a first deed of trust from liability for the deficiency remaining after a nonjudicial sale of the security.

The appeal presents a question of first impression in California. We hold that the creditor cannot recover from the guarantor the unpaid balance upon the note…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Bloom v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. StarleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Offer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Western Security Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Regents of University of California v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Victory Highway Village, Inc. v. WeaverDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
  5. Krueger v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API