March v. Barnet
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County, and from an order denying a new trial. J. H. Logan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
One Button recovered a judgment against Steen and March, the maker and indorser respectively of a certain promissory note. He assigned the judgment to Barnet. Barnet’s assignee took out execution and levied upon the property of March. Under execution sale this property to the extent of $770 was applied to the payment of the judgment and costs of sale. The present action is brought by March against Steen, Bar-net, and others, who were assignees of the judgment at certain times, for the sum of $1,400. The complaint alleges the value of March’s property levied upon and sold to be that sum, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Simpson v. GriffinNew York Supreme Court · 1812
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dobbs v. PuringtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- March v. BarnetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People Ex Rel. Hardacre v. ReaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- March v. BarnetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- March v. BarnetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897