Gursky v. Rosenberg
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of nonsuit.
The action was commenced on December 14, 1926, to recover the sum of $4,889.50 with interest thereon from April 13, 1926, on which date the plaintiff paid the amount to the San Francisco Bank, a corporation.
According to the complaint the plaintiff and Nathan Bronstein with their wives on November 9, 1920, executed to the bank their note for $8,000, payable one year after date, with interest, and secured the same by a trust deed of certain real property owned by them. The note provided that “in case any change is made in the title to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Estate of HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Warner v. WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. DickinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Rogers v. MeyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sanders v. MagillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Commercial Casualty Ins. v. Petroleum Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Estate of McDanielCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Ford v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Wolfert v. GuadagnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933