Legal Opinion

Gursky v. Rosenberg

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1930No. Docket No. 7010PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of nonsuit.

The action was commenced on December 14, 1926, to recover the sum of $4,889.50 with interest thereon from April 13, 1926, on which date the plaintiff paid the amount to the San Francisco Bank, a corporation.

According to the complaint the plaintiff and Nathan Bronstein with their wives on November 9, 1920, executed to the bank their note for $8,000, payable one year after date, with interest, and secured the same by a trust deed of certain real property owned by them. The note provided that “in case any change is made in the title to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Warner v. WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. DickinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Rogers v. MeyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sanders v. MagillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Commercial Casualty Ins. v. Petroleum Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  3. Estate of McDanielCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Ford v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Wolfert v. GuadagnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API