Legal Opinion

Tooley v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 27, 2000No. AC 19429PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

In Shortt v. New Milford Police Dept., 212 Conn. 294, 304, 562 A.2d 7 (1989), the Connecticut Supreme Court held that a trial court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear an employee’s claim for wages under General Statutes § 31-721 until the *487employee has exhausted his or her administrative remedies by complying with the grievance procedure specified in an applicable collective bargaining agreement. The principal issue in this appeal is whether this jurisdictional barrier is overcome by an employer’s partially affirmative response to an employee’s informal grievance that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Glover v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Pamela B. v. MentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Medical Examining Board for State Employee Disability RetirementConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  2. Hoffman Fuel Co. v. ElliottConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  3. Pitruzello v. MuroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Lundborg v. LawlerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. KeatingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API