Legal Opinion
Lundborg v. Lawler
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 15, 2001No. AC 19426PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
Pursuant to General Statutes § 51-164s, the Superior Court is authorized to hear all cases except those over which the probate courts have original jurisdiction.1 The principal issue in this case is whether *453claims of fraudulent misrepresentation were sufficiently raised in the Probate Court to preclude their relitigation in the Superior Court sitting as a court of general jurisdiction. The trial court, concluding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to proceed, granted a motion to dismiss and rendered judgment in favor of the party resisting relitigation. We agree.
PROCED…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pamela B. v. MentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Mazziotti v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Lawrence Brunoli, Inc. v. Town of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Lopiano v. LopianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hill v. State Employees Retirement CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Taylor v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Grabowski v. BristolConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Windsor Locks Associates v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- McNamara v. Saxe (In Re McNamara)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.