Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Medical Examining Board for State Employee Disability Retirement
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 25, 2003No. AC 22334PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff, Jane Bailey, appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion of the defendant medical examining board for state employee disability retirement (board)1 to dismiss her administrative appeal on the ground that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act (UAPA).2 3The plaintiff claims that (1) the court improperly dismissed her appeal on the ground that the board’s denial of disability retirement benefits was not a final decision in a contested case within the meaning of the UAPA and (2) the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Lewis v. Connecticut Gaming Policy BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Nizzardo v. State Traffic CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Summit Hydropower Partnership v. Commissioner of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Town of Killingly v. Connecticut Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Peters v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Sastrom v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Mercer v. RodriquezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Hill v. State Employees Retirement CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Bloom v. Department of LaborConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.