Legal Opinion
Pitruzello v. Muro
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 4, 2002No. AC 22307PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
A foreign corporation may be haled into court in Connecticut only if a plaintiff alleges jurisdictional facts that, if proven, would satisfy one of the provisions of our long arm statute, General Statutes § 33-929 (f).1 The issue in this case is whether a complaint has alleged, with sufficient specificity, that a foreign corporation solicited business; General Statutes § 33-929 (f) (2); or engaged in tortious conduct; General Statutes § 33-929 (f) (4); that is actionable in this state.2 Holding that the jurisdictional facts alleged in the complaint were too conclusory to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Standard Tallow Corp. v. JowdySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Lombard Brothers, Inc. v. General Asset Management Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Lawrence Brunoli, Inc. v. Town of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Gaudio v. GaudioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Olson v. Accessory Controls & Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bove v. BoveConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- MacCallum v. New York Yankees PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Johnson v. Atlantic Health Services, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Bove v. BoveConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Pro Performance Corporate Services, Inc. v. Frank GoldmanConnecticut Superior Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.