Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Keating
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
This case concerns the authority of the Superior Court to enforce an arbitration clause in a franchise agreement. As part of the arbitration clause, the parties agreed that arbitration would take place in Bridgeport, Connecticut. The franchisor brought four applications in the Superior Court to compel the franchisees to arbitrate. All but one of the franchisees are residents of Florida. The principal question in this case is whether the trial court properly concluded that the selection of Connecticut as the arbitral forum is sufficient to confer on a Connecticut judicial…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Emily DistajoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Standard Tallow Corp. v. JowdySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Subway Equipment Leasing Corp. v. ForteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Reed v. Doctor's Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Weihing v. DodsworthConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. KeatingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Directory Assistants, Inc. v. Cooke, Cameron, Travis & Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- Reed v. Doctor's Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005