Legal Opinion
Elemary v. Philipp Holzmann A.G.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 6, 2008No. Civil Action 07-654(RCL)PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, District. Judge.
This opinion addresses two Motions to Dismiss that raise several common issues.
Defendants Billy Harbert, Jr. (“Billy Harbert”) and B.L. Harbert International, LLC (“HILLC”) moved to dismiss all claims against them for lack of personal jurisdiction, improper venue, and/or'failure to state a claim. The Court has considered defendants’ motion [13], plaintiffs opposition thereto [17], defendants’ reply [21], and the applicable law. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is hereby GRANTED, and all claims against these defendants are…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Cheeks v. Fort Myer Construction CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Jefferson v. CollinsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- United States v. Honeywell International Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- United States v. Science Applications International Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- United States Ex Rel. Hood v. Satory Global, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.