Legal Opinion
United States v. Honeywell International Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 8, 2011No. Civil Action 08-961 (RWR)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
The government filed a complaint against defendant Honeywell International Inc., alleging violations of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-33, as well as a common law unjust enrichment claim in connection with the sale of Zylon body armor shields. Honeywell has moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim and sufficiently plead fraud. Because the government has sufficiently alleged its FCA and unjust enrichment claims and pled fraud with sufficient particularity, Honeywell’s motion to dismiss will be…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Tran v. Computer Sciences Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States v. Toyobo Co. LtdDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- United States ex rel. Westrick v. Second Chance Body Armor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- United States Ex Rel. Groat v. Boston Heart Diagnostics Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States Ex Rel. Scollick v. NarulaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.