Legal Opinion

United States v. Science Applications International Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 15, 2008No. Civil Action 04-1543 (RWR)PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.

The United States brought this action against Science Applications International Corporation (“SAIC”) under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729, and District of Columbia common law, alleging SAIC’s failure to disclose organizational conflicts of interest (“OCIs”) as was required under two contracts that SAIC entered into with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”). SAIC has moved under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6) to dismiss the government’s FCA claims in Counts I and II of the amended complaint…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Beard v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Burke, Kenneth M. v. Gould, William B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  5. United States of America, Ex Rel. Kreindler & Kreindler, Cross-Appellee v. United Technologies Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. Science Applications International Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Science Applications International CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  3. United States v. Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. United States v. Toyobo Co. LtdDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. District Hospital Partners, L.P. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API