Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Hood v. Satory Global, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 23, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-0774PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs William Robin Hood and Troy Maxon, information technology specialists, moved across the country to work for Satory Global, LLC in Washington, D.C. Plaintiffs were assigned to do work for the Department of Justice pursuant to a subcontract Satory held for information technology support services. They allege that, upon beginning work, they learned that Satory was fraudulently billing the Department of Justice by charging for time spent on private corporate development work instead of on the contract and by performing its subcontracting tasks…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  4. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Aktieselskabet Af 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Tran v. Computer Sciences Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. United States v. Berkeley Heartlab, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2016
  3. United States Ex Rel. Groat v. Boston Heart Diagnostics Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  4. Eastern Savings Bank, Fsb v. PapageorgeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  5. United States Ex Rel. Morsell v. Symantec Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API