Legal Opinion
Holmwood v. Sugavanam
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 5, 1991No. 91-1144PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
948 F.2d 1236
20 U.S.P.Q.2d 1712
Graham HOLMWOOD, Erik Regel, Paul-Ernst Frohberger, Gerhard
Jager, Karl Heinz Buchel, Wilhelm Brandes and
Klaus Lurssen, Appellants,
v.
Balasubramanyan SUGAVANAM, Paul A. Worthington and John M.
Clough, Appellees.
No. 91-1144.
United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.
Nov. 5, 1991.
Leonard Horn, of Sprung Horn Kramer & Woods, New York City, argued, for appellants. With him on the brief was Karl F. Milde, Jr.
Mark G. Paulson, of Cushman, Darby & Cushman, Washington, D.C., argued, for appellees. With him on the brief was Paul N. Kokulis.
Before NEWMAN, ARCHER, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- John H. Coleman v. Martin B. DinesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Holmwood v. SugavanamCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Mark C. Newkirk v. Donald A. Lulejian, Alphonse W. Faure and Eugene F. FijalkowskiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Borror v. HerzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Peter B. Cooper v. David GoldfarbCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Yoshihiro Fujikawa, Mikio Suzuki, Hiroshi Iwasaki, Mitsuaki Sakashita and Masaki Kitahara v. Sompong Wattanasin, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Unifrax I LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- In Re: SteedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Kenexa Brassring, Inc. v. Taleo Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.