Legal Opinion
In Re: Steed
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 1, 2015No. 2014-1458PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Thomas Steed, Sourav Bhattaeharya, and Sandeep Seshadrijois (collectively “Steed” or “Applicants”) appeal the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Officé Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) affirming the rejection of claims 37 and 39-51 of United States Patent Application No. 10/819,600 (“the '600 Application”) on the ground of obviousness, 35 U.S.C. § 103. 1 Remaining claims 52-54 were subject to a restriction requirement at the time of the Board proceeding and were not considered by the Board. Bd. Op. at 4-5. We now affirm the Board’s decision.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- John H. Coleman v. Martin B. DinesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- In Re Scott T. JolleyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Mergenthaler v. ScudderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1897
- In Re Omeprazole Patent LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Arctic Cat Inc. v. Gep Power Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Perfect Surgical Techniques, Inc. v. Olympus America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Ati Technologies Ulc v. IancuCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- TC Tech. LLC v. Sprint Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.