Legal Opinion
Kenexa Brassring, Inc. v. Taleo Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 18, 2010No. Civ. 07-521-SLRPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Kenexa Brassring, Inc (“plaintiff’) owns two patents directed to systems and methods for accurately entering information into a highly structured database from multiple non-uniformly formatted data sources. On August 27, 2007, plaintiff commenced this patent infringement action against defendants Taleo Corporation (“Taleo”) and Vurv Technology, Inc. (“Vurv”) (collectively “defendants”) alleging that multiple products sold by each company infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 5,999,-939 (“the '939 patent”) and 6,996,561 (“the '561…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Withrow v. SpearsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- ArcelorMittal France v. AK Steel Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2011
- Ultratec, Inc. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014
- Acosta v. Shalimar DistributorsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- TrackTime, LLC v. Amazon.com Services LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.