Legal Opinion
Achates Reference Publishing, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 30, 2015No. 2014-1767, 2014-1788PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINN, Circuit Judge.
Achates Reference Publishing, Inc. (“Ac-hates”) appeals from the decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”) in inter partes review (“IPR”) proceedings instituted on petitions filed by Apple Inc. (“Apple”) against Achates’ U.S. Patents No. 5,982,889 (the “'889 patent”) and No. 6,173,403 (the “'403 patent”) (collectively, the “patents-at-issue”) and determining that claims 1-4 of the '889 patent and claims 1-12 and 17-19 of the '403 patent were invalid. See Apple Inc. v. Achates Reference Publ’g, Inc., IPR2013-00081, 2014 WL 2530789 (P.T.A.B. June 2, 2014)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Sebelius v. Auburn Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Shaw Industries Group, Inc. v. Automated Creel Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Sightsound Technologies, LLC v. Apple Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Harmonic, Inc. v. Avid Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.