Legal Opinion
Harmonic, Inc. v. Avid Technology, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 1, 2016No. 2015-1072PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STOLL, Circuit Judge.
Harmonic Inc. filed an inter partes review (“IPR”) petition with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) to review the patentability of Avid Technology, Ine.’s (“Avid”) U.S. Patent No. 5,495,291 (“the '291 patent”). The Board instituted an IPR proceeding on a subset of the grounds in the petition and ultimately determined that the instituted ground did not render claims 11-16 of the '291 patent unpatentable. Harmonic appeals the Board’s final written decision, challenging bqith the Board’s patentability determination and its refusal to revisit grounds of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- In Re Baxter International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Shaw Industries Group, Inc. v. Automated Creel Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Celgene Corporation v. PeterCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Facebook, Inc. v. Windy City Innovations, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co. v. Genesis Attachments, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- HP Inc. v. MPHJ Technology Investment., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.