Legal Opinion

Sebelius v. Auburn Regional Medical Center

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 22, 2013No. 11-1231PublishedCited by 500 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ginsburg

This case concerns the time within which health care providers may file an administrative appeal from the initial determination of the reimbursement due them for inpatient services rendered to Medicare beneficiaries. Government contractors, called fiscal intermediaries, receive cost reports annually from care providers and notify them of the reimbursement amount for which they qualify. A provider dissatisfied with the fiscal intermediary’s determination may appeal to an administrative body named the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (PRRB or Board). The governing statute, § 602(h)(1)(D), 97…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Gonzalez v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by500 opinions

  1. Bruce Goldfarb v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  2. Trump v. HawaiiSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  3. City of Arlington v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. United States v. Gerald WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  5. Musacchio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

495 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API