Legal Opinion
Nanney v. Chrysler Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 26, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-725-WKSPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
STAPLETON, Chief Judge:
This is a duty of fair representation and • breach of contract action brought by plaintiff Jimmy Nanney against his union, Local 1183 of the United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (the “Union”), and his employer, Chrysler Corporation. At issue is the settlement by the Union and Chrysler of a grievance against Chrysler filed by the Union on plaintiff’s behalf. Plaintiff claims that his Union breached its duty of fair representation by improperly settling the grievance, and that Chrysler violated its collective…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Clayton v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brady v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Edward A. Winter v. Local Union No. 639, Affiliated With the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and Maloney Concrete Company (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Charles Monroe v. International Union, UawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Aldridge v. Ludwig-Honold Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1300 v. LovelaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Balsavage v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Walker v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1985
- Keiper v. United Automobile Workers' Union, Local 677District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1300 v. LovelaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015