Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1300 v. Lovelace
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.
Maryland law has long recognized the rule that a union member must exhaust the union’s internal remedies before filing suit in court. Walsh v. Commc’ns Workers of Am., Local 2336, 259 Md. 608, 612, 271 A.2d 148, 150 (1970). If these procedures are procedurally or substantively inadequate, however, exhaustion is excused. Id. In this case, we consider whether union remedies are inadequate when they do not provide the monetary damages a union member1 seeks *562when he sues his union and a fellow union member for defamation.
FACTS AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Respondent, William T. Lovelace, Jr., worked for…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Clayton v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Heat & Power Corp. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Priester v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Prince George's County Police Civilian Employees Ass'n v. Prince George's County Ex Rel. Prince George's County Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- State v. Keller-BeeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Amalgamated Transit Union v. Md. Transit Admin.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Bahreini v. ZsebedicsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.