Legal Opinion
Clayton v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 26, 1981No. 80-5049PublishedCited by 484 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
An employee seeking a remedy for an alleged breach of the collective-bargaining agreement between his union and employer must attempt to exhaust any exclusive grievance and arbitration procedures established by that agreement before he may maintain a suit against his union or employer under § 301 (a) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, 61 Stat. 156, 29 U. S. C. § 185 (a). Republic Steel Corp. v. Maddox, 379 U. S. 650, 652-653 (1965); see Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc., 424 U. S. 554, 563 (1976); Vaca v. Sipes, *682386 U. S. 171, 184 (1967). The question presented by these eases…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by484 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Philip J. Podobnik v. United States Postal Service National Rural Letter Carriers Association John E. Potter, Postmaster General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Fowlkes v. Ironworkers Local 40Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
479 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.