Legal Opinion
Keiper v. United Automobile Workers' Union, Local 677
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 27, 1994No. 92-7087PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CAHN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Barry D. Keiper (“Keiper” or “plaintiff’) brought this action against Mack Trucks, Inc. (“Mack”), his previous employer, and the United Automobile Workers’ Union, Local 677 (“Local 677”) (collectively the “defendants”). Keiper claims that Mack breached its contract (the “Master Agreement”) with Local 677. Keiper also alleges that Local 677 violated his rights under Section 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act of 1947 (“Section 301”), 29 U.S.C. § 185, by breaching its duty of fair representation. Currently before the court are defendants’ motions for…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Clayton v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Alfred F. Harter v. Gaf CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1300 v. LovelaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1300 v. LovelaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- MAY v. ELK PIPELINE, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020