Rich, Rich & Nance v. Carolina Construction Corp.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LAKE, Chief Justice.
The sole question presented for review in this case is whether the rule against perpetuities prevents enforcement of contractual rights found in an addendum to a real estate sales contract providing for a $600 “availability fee” to be paid upon the sale of each lot in a subdivision. The Court of Appeals held that such an agreement violates the rule against perpetuities and, therefore, is unenforceable. Rich, Rich & Nance v. Carolina Constr. Corp., 144 N.C. App. 303, 307, 548 S.E.2d 541, 544 (2001). For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the decision of the Court of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crockett v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Smith v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Parker v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Anderson v. 50 East 72nd Street CondominiumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Mercer v. MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Spanish Oaks, Inc. v. Hy-Vee, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- New Bar Partnership v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- PCS Phosphate Co., Inc. v. Norfolk Southern Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2007
- Brown Bros. Harriman Trust Co. v. BensonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- BROWN BROS. HARRIMAN TRUST CO. v. BensonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.