Legal Opinion

Mercer v. Mercer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 9, 1949PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarNhill, J.

The court below not only denied the motion of plaintiffs for judgment on the pleadings, but also affirmatively adjudged, without objection or exception, that the trust created by the testator’s codicil to his will is valid. Hence the one question presented for decision is this : Is said trust within the rule against perpetuities ?

Much has been written on the subject of perpetuities. Repetition here would serve no useful purpose. Suffice it to say that the common law rule against perpetuities is recognized and enforced in this State.

This rule is not one of construction but a positive mandate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lockhart's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Friday's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Springs v. HopkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Billingsley v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  5. American Trust Co. v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Poindexter v. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Wing v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., NASupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Lee v. . OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. McQueen v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Porth v. PorthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API