Legal Opinion

Parker v. Parker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 27, 1960No. 241PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooRe, J.

No devise or grant of a future interest in property is valid unless the title thereto must vest, if at all, not later than twenty- one years, plus the period of gestation, after some life or lives in being at the time of the creation of the interest. If there is a possibility such future interest may not vest within the time prescribed, the gift or grant is void. McPherson v. Bank, 240 N.C. 1, 15, 81 S.E. 2d 386, quoting from McQueen v. Trust Co., 234 N.C. 737, 741, 68 S.E. 2d 831. The rule refers solely to the vesting of estates and does not concern itself with their possession or enjoyment.…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Little v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Bowen v. Hackney.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Coddington v. . StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. McPherson v. First & Citizens National Bank of Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Carter v. KemptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Poindexter v. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Kale v. ForrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Joyner v. DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Strickland v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Stellings v. AutrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API