Brown Bros. Harriman Trust Co. v. Benson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Judge.
The sole issue before the Court in this case is whether the North Carolina Constitution requires application of the common law rule against perpetuities’ restriction of the remote vesting of future interests in property. We conclude that it does not.
I. Factual Background and Procedural History
On 27 November 2007, Defendant Anne P. Benson executed a trust (“Benson Trust”) naming Brown Brothers Harriman Trust Company, N.A. (“Brown Brothers”) as Trustee, naming her children, John H. Benson, Anne H. Benson, and Linley C. Benson, as primary beneficiaries, and naming her unborn and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Perry v. StancilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Robins v. Town of HillsboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
- In Re SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Seawell v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- BROWN BROS. HARRIMAN TRUST CO. v. BensonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010