Lindenmuth v. Safe Harbor Water Power Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Maxey,
On June 4, 1902, David Fry and wife granted by an agreement recorded January 25, 1906, to John M. Wit-mer, his heirs and assigns, “the right at any and all times hereafter to cause by the erection of dams or other works the water of the Susquehanna Eiver to flow back upon or be withdrawn from Fry’s land” (along which the Susquehanna Eiver flowed), “together with all of the rights, easements, privileges and appurtenances in and to said lands which will be required or needed for the full enjoyment of the right of backing and flowage.” This grant was preceded by a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ladd v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Leonard v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
- Graham v. WalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- Tinicum Fishing Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
- Anania v. SerentaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Murphy, Inc. v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Loch Sheldrake Associates, Inc. v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Miller v. Lutheran Conference and Camp Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Northwestern Improvement Co. v. LowryMontana Supreme Court · 1937
- Balestra v. ButtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.