Legal Opinion

In Re Robert K. Grasselli and Harley F. Hardman, and Rohm and Haas Company, Intervenor

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 15, 1983No. Appeal 83-504PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NIES, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board) affirming the final rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (1976) of claims 1-34, all of the claims of reissue application serial No. 713,024 filed August 9,1976. We reverse with respect to claims 15 and 19-32 and affirm the board’s decision with respect to all other claims.

I

The original patent sought to be reissued here, U.S. Patent No. 3,642,930 (issued on February 15, 1972, to Standard Oil Company, Cleveland, Ohio), is directed to catalysts containing an alkali…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In re ArkleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  3. In re SasseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
  4. Application of James R. Tiffin and Earl ErdmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  5. In re FracalossiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Sang-Su LeeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Genetics Institute, LLC v. Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  3. Therasense, Inc. v. Beckton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  4. In Re James C. NapierCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Asyst Technologies, Inc. v. Emtrak, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API