Application of James R. Tiffin and Earl Erdman
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
The Patent Office petitions for a rehearing or modification of our decision, handed down June 10, 1971. The solicitor’s brief in support of the petition concedes to appellant claims 4, 7, and 8, drawn to processes of making “cups,” and claim 17, drawn to a “cup,” but asks reversal of our decision as to claims 1, 2, 10, * 11, and 13, drawn broadly to processes of making “containers,” and claims 3, 12, and 14-16, drawn to “containers.”
This distinction between the two groups of claims is based (1) on appellants’ specification, in which it is stated that,
While the…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Application of Gerald McLaughlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of James R. Tiffin and Earl ErdmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Don C. LawCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of Carroll Trowbridge KennedyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
4Cited by25 opinions
- In Re Huai-Hung KaoCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- In Re Lance G. Peterson and Ioannis VasatisCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Allergan, Inc. v. Apotex Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- In re FielderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- In re LindnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.