Legal Opinion
In re Sasse
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided July 17, 1980No. Appeal No. 80-503PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board) affirming the rejections of claims 1-13 in appellants’ application serial No. 459,158, filed April 8, 1974, for “Dichlorothiazolyl Urea Compounds and Herbicidal Compositions,” under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by a prior art reference and 35 U.S.C. § 135(b) as being statutorily barred by a prior art reference from which claims could have been copied. We reverse the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 135(b). We affirm the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chapman v. WintroathSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Application of Edward Burton LegriceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- In re PayneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- In re SamourCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- In re SchaumannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Amgen Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (Now Known as Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- In Re John A. DonohueCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- In Re Morris EpsteinCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Paperless Accounting, Inc. v. Bay Area Rapid Transit SystemCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- In Re Antor Media Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.