In re Arkley
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Nigh, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claim 30 in appellants’ application serial No. 329,212, filed December 9,1963, for a cephalosporin-type antibiotic known as cephaloridine. No claim has been allowed. We reverse.
The Subject Matter Claimed
The appealed claim is drawn to a single compound, by structural formula, and reads:
30. A compound of the formula
[[Image here]]
This compound is said to be a broad spectrum antibiotic, effective against both gram-positive and gram-negative micro-organisms, and to possess many other…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Application of Heinrich Ruschig, Walter Aumuller, Gerhard Korger, Hans Wagner, Josef Scholz and Alfred BanderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Application of Edward Burton LegriceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of Carl A. Lukach, Setha G. Olson and Harold M. SpurlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Heinrich Ruschig, Walter Aumüller, Gerhard Korger, Hans Wagner, Josef Scholz and Alfred BänderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Thomas Lynn Fields v. Lloyd H. Conover and Robert B. WoodwardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Ssih Equipment S.A. v. United States International Trade Commission and Stewart-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Net MoneyIN, Inc. v. VeriSign, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Structural Rubber Products Company v. Park Rubber Company and International Metals and MacHines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Thomas & Betts Corporation v. Litton Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Sanofi-Synthelabo v. Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.