Legal Opinion

In Re James C. Napier

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 22, 1995No. 93-1363PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLAGER, Circuit Judge.

James C. Napier (Napier) appeals from the March 16, 1994 decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board), Appeal No. 93-0040. The Board affirmed the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-3, 5, 7, 8, and 10 of application Serial No. 07/467,-179 (the ’179 application), entitled “Redirection of Turbine Exhaust Noise.” 1 Claims 1-3 and 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(b) and 103 (1988), 2 and claims 7, 8, and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103. We agree that all the claims are unpatentable on the ground…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cable Electric Products, Inc. v. Genmark, Inc., A/K/A Diablo Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. Richard F. Carella v. Starlight Archery and Pro Line CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  3. In Re Baxter Travenol LabsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  4. In Re Francis J.A.M.C. De Blauwe and Frank K.A. SelleslagsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. In Re Richard E. WoodruffCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Twi Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  4. Superior Fireplace Company v. The Majestic Products Company and Vermont Castings, Inc., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. In Re MouttetCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API