Legal Opinion

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 2002No. 2000-1984 & 2001-0493PublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 95 Ohio St.3d 512.] GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.,

2002-Ohio-2842.] Insurance—Continuous occurrence of environmental pollution triggers claims under multiple insurance policies—Insured entitled to source coverage from a single policy of its choice that covers all sums incurred as damages during the policy period—Pollution exclusion clause in insurance contract that bars coverage for expected or…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hybud Equipment Corp. v. Sphere Drake InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Ruta v. Breckenridge-Remy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. O'Day v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  5. J.H. France Refractories Co. v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Groob v. KeyBankOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Portage County Board of Commissioners v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Jarupan v. HannaOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State of Cal. v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API