Legal Opinion

Security First National Bank v. Grant

California Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1964No. L. A. No. 27299PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Appellants, hereinafter sometimes called objectors, are two minors appearing by the guardian of their respective estates. As presumptive remainder beneficiaries of a testamentary trust, they appeal from certain parts of an order settling the eighth account current of the trustee. Their purported appeal from certain parts of an order overruling their objections to the account should be dismissed; such order is not one of those listed in section 1240 of the Probate Code and is not appealable. (Estate of Schechman (1955) 45 Cal.2d 50, 54 [5] [286 P.2d 345]; Estate of Smead (1938) 12 Cal.2d 20,…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Loring v. Town of KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Goad v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Schlyen v. SchlyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Estate of MarreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Lazzarone v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Callnon v. WinrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Richer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. In Re Duncan TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Triplett v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API