Legal Opinion
Van Tassel v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided October 3, 1974No. S.F. 23114PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCOMB, J.
Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition restraining respondent court from enforcing a preliminary injunction and from proceeding further with an action filed by real party in interest for a permanent injunction and declaratory relief.
Facts: Petitioner is the mother of Pamela Parrish, who was killed in an accident while riding in an automobile owned by Arnold Wiebe, Inc., and leased to Caruthers Union High School District. The other motor vehicle involved in the accident was uninsured.
Kenneth Van Tassel, the husband of petitioner, and the stepfather of Pamela, was the named…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Orpustan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. RuizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Felner v. Meritplan Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Pacific Automobile Insurance v. LangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Quintano v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Boys Club of San Fernando Valley, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Dunshee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.