Legal Opinion
Harder v. Allred
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 15, 1923No. Civ. No. 4386PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.
Action to rescind a contract for the purchase of certain real estate and to recover money paid as a deposit in part payment thereon.
The complaint is in two counts. The first is one in assumpsit for money had and received. The second sets forth at length the facts upon which the alleged obligation arose.
From the evidence it appears that plaintiff paid to defendants under a written contract the sum of $500 as deposit and part payment upon certain real property, consisting of a lot of land, together with a dwelling-house situated thereon, located at the northeast comer of Forty-fourth Avenue and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Buckmaster v. BertramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Eichelberger v. Mills Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908
- Kofoed v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Quarg v. ScherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Sears v. StinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1892
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Harding v. Home Investment & Savings Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1930
- Jamison v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Swasey v. De L'EtancheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Brooks v. JensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Hargrove v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.