Jamison v. City of Charlotte
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
It is passing strange that plaintiff’s counsel “objects and excepts to each finding of fact embodied in the judgment,” when each fact found by the Judge was either alleged in the Complaint, which they signed, and was admitted in the defendants’ Answer, or copied verbatim from a stipulation and agreement of facts which they and the defendants’ counsel signed.
No issues of fact are raised by the pleadings in this action.
As to the Judge’s conclusions of law, the plaintiff’s appeal entry is: “The plaintiff objects and excepts to each conclusion of law embodied in the judgment.” This is merely a…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Stanley v. Supervisors of AlbanySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Cream of Wheat Co. v. County of Grand ForksSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- C. F. Smith Co. v. FitzgeraldMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Rawls v. . LuptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Baker v. DruesedowSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hart v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
- Madison Cablevision, Inc. v. City of MorgantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Maready v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- Sykes v. BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State Education Assistance Authority v. Bank of StatesvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.