Legal Opinion
Harding v. Home Investment & Savings Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1930No. Nos. 5379, 5412, 5413PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGivens, C. J.
In 1922 the Hardings executed a note, secured by a mortgage on their land in Twin Falls county, to the Home Investment and Savings Company. The note and mortgage were immediately assigned to the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.
The note was due April 1, 1927. Late in 1926, Gleed Miller, an officer of the Investment Company, went to the Hardings and represented to them that the note would soon be due and that he would like to arrange for its extension with the Insurance Company but that it would be necessary to sign the extension agreement at once, which they did. The evidence sustains the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Hind v. Oriental Products Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Cates v. McNeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Kofoed v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- McLean v. FickeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Suitts v. First Security Bank of Idaho, N.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. O'NEILLIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Clark v. St. Paul Property & Liability Insurance CompaniesIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- White v. DoneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.